Why are AARs not considered critiques?

AARs, or After Action Reviews, are structured processes aimed at enhancing learning and performance through the analysis of actions taken during training or operations. The reason they are not considered critiques is that they do not focus on determining success or failure. Instead, AARs emphasize what happened, why it happened, and how things can be improved, fostering an environment of continuous improvement. They are designed to be objective and constructive, allowing participants to reflect on their experiences without the pressure of a judgmental critique that would imply a right or wrong outcome.

By concentrating on the learning aspect rather than labeling performances as successful or unsuccessful, AARs encourage open discussion and critical thinking, which are essential for developing individual and unit capabilities. This perspective supports a culture of learning where lessons can be drawn from both successes and shortcomings, ultimately leading to better preparation and improved effectiveness in future operations.